REvil Gang Takes Credit for Massive Kaseya Attack and Asks for $70 Million Ransom

63); padding: 10px 20px 7px; color: #fff; letter-spacing: -0.

 Here are a few things to notice: The quality of the two people speaking in terms of both their voice fidelity and naturalnessThe use of appropriate colloquialisms like water works for describing tears and cryingThe completely organic nature of their banter and the fact that there even was banterHow well the human speakers get the concepts in the article.Thats not something AI can do.

And thats all before we get to the quality of the voices and even the vocal tones.those 19th-century textile workers who opposed the use of automation machinery.The staggering implications First.

Im showing you how a tiny little feature in the corner of a Google notebook experiment can make up two entirely fabricated speakers that are indistinguishable from human.or hurt the feelings of someone I care for?I have always loved new technology.

NotebookLM had no options other than to speed up the speaking speed.

it could sometimes be unclear whether they were real or not.he explores the post-scarcity world.

Phil Jones sets these workers in a larger global context.what then? Jones chooses optimism: we will have to imagine a new world for ourselves.

regulation required Editorial standards Show Comments.and Kate Crawfords recent book on the extractive nature of the AI industry.